1968 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 1991 Italdesign Nazca
To start off, 1991 Italdesign Nazca is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1991 Italdesign Nazca. (350 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 1991 Italdesign Nazca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Italdesign Nazca. (470 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1968 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Italdesign Nazca.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Bizzarrini A3C | 1991 Italdesign Nazca | |
| Make | Bizzarrini | Italdesign |
| Model | A3C | Nazca |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1991 |
| Engine Size | 5354 cc | 4988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 361 HP | 350 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 470 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2090 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2600 mm |
