1968 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 2000 Opel Omega
To start off, 2000 Opel Omega is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2000 Opel Omega. (305 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 2000 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Opel Omega weights approximately 50 kg more than 1968 Bizzarrini A3C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Opel Omega. (450 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1968 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Bizzarrini A3C | 2000 Opel Omega | |
| Make | Bizzarrini | Opel |
| Model | A3C | Omega |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
| Engine Size | 5354 cc | 5666 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 361 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1310 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2620 mm |
