1968 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 2002 Lincoln Continental

To start off, 2002 Lincoln Continental is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lincoln Continental (410 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1968 Bizzarrini A3C. (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1968 Bizzarrini A3C.

Because 1968 Bizzarrini A3C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Bizzarrini A3C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lincoln Continental, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lincoln Continental (571 Nm @ 5250 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Bizzarrini A3C. (510 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Bizzarrini A3C. 2002 Lincoln Continental has automatic transmission and 1968 Bizzarrini A3C has manual transmission. 1968 Bizzarrini A3C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Lincoln Continental will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: