1968 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 2009 Chevrolet HHR
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet HHR. (260 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet HHR.
Because 1968 Bizzarrini A3C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Bizzarrini A3C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet HHR. (353 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1968 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet HHR.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Bizzarrini A3C | 2009 Chevrolet HHR | |
Make | Bizzarrini | Chevrolet |
Model | A3C | HHR |
Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 5354 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 361 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 510 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2640 mm |