1968 Bizzarrini GT vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 1968 Bizzarrini GT is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Bizzarrini GT (108 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Bizzarrini GT should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden EJ weights approximately 454 kg more than 1968 Bizzarrini GT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Holden EJ (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Bizzarrini GT. (157 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1963 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Bizzarrini GT.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Bizzarrini GT | 1963 Holden EJ | |
| Make | Bizzarrini | Holden |
| Model | GT | EJ |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1897 cc | 2262 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1134 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2680 mm |
