1968 Bizzarrini Manta vs. 1976 Citroen CX
To start off, 1976 Citroen CX is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Bizzarrini Manta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Bizzarrini Manta would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Bizzarrini Manta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Bizzarrini Manta (350 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 235 more horse power than 1976 Citroen CX. (115 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Bizzarrini Manta should accelerate faster than 1976 Citroen CX.
Because 1968 Bizzarrini Manta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Bizzarrini Manta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Bizzarrini Manta (511 Nm) has 325 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Citroen CX. (186 Nm). This means 1968 Bizzarrini Manta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Bizzarrini Manta | 1976 Citroen CX | |
| Make | Bizzarrini | Citroen |
| Model | Manta | CX |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5354 cc | 2345 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 115 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 511 Nm | 186 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1060 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2850 mm |
