1968 Bizzarrini Manta vs. 2003 MCC ForFour
To start off, 2003 MCC ForFour is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Bizzarrini Manta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Bizzarrini Manta would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Bizzarrini Manta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Bizzarrini Manta (350 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 257 more horse power than 2003 MCC ForFour. (93 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Bizzarrini Manta should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC ForFour.
Because 1968 Bizzarrini Manta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Bizzarrini Manta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Bizzarrini Manta (511 Nm) has 386 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC ForFour. (125 Nm). This means 1968 Bizzarrini Manta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC ForFour.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Bizzarrini Manta | 2003 MCC ForFour | |
| Make | Bizzarrini | MCC |
| Model | Manta | ForFour |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5354 cc | 1331 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 511 Nm | 125 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 3760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1060 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2510 mm |
