1968 BMW 1600 vs. 1964 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 1968 BMW 1600 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford Zodiac (108 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1968 BMW 1600. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford Zodiac should accelerate faster than 1968 BMW 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Ford Zodiac weights approximately 280 kg more than 1968 BMW 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Ford Zodiac (191 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 BMW 1600. (160 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1964 Ford Zodiac will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 BMW 1600.
Compare all specifications:
1968 BMW 1600 | 1964 Ford Zodiac | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 1600 | Zodiac |
Year Released | 1968 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 2553 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 79.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1270 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2780 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 45 L |