1968 BMW 1600 vs. 1995 Caterham Super 7
To start off, 1995 Caterham Super 7 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 BMW 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 BMW 1600 would be higher. At 1,990 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 BMW 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Caterham Super 7 (138 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1968 BMW 1600. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Caterham Super 7 should accelerate faster than 1968 BMW 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 BMW 1600 weights approximately 436 kg more than 1995 Caterham Super 7.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 BMW 1600 (160 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Caterham Super 7. (156 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1968 BMW 1600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Caterham Super 7.
Compare all specifications:
1968 BMW 1600 | 1995 Caterham Super 7 | |
Make | BMW | Caterham |
Model | 1600 | Super 7 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1995 |
Body Type | Convertible | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 156 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 554 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2260 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 30 L |