1968 BMW 1600 vs. 1997 Honda CR-V
To start off, 1997 Honda CR-V is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 BMW 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 BMW 1600 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Honda CR-V (128 HP) has 28 more horse power than 1968 BMW 1600. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1968 BMW 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Honda CR-V weights approximately 510 kg more than 1968 BMW 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1997 Honda CR-V (180 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 BMW 1600. (160 Nm). This means 1997 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 BMW 1600.
Compare all specifications:
1968 BMW 1600 | 1997 Honda CR-V | |
Make | BMW | Honda |
Model | 1600 | CR-V |
Year Released | 1968 | 1997 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 128 HP |
Torque | 160 Nm | 180 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 8.8 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2620 mm |