1968 BMW 1600 vs. 1999 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 1999 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 BMW 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 BMW 1600 would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Toyota 4Runner (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1968 BMW 1600. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1968 BMW 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 849 kg more than 1968 BMW 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Toyota 4Runner (290 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 BMW 1600. (160 Nm). This means 1999 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 BMW 1600.
Compare all specifications:
1968 BMW 1600 | 1999 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | 1600 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1968 | 1999 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 3400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 290 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1839 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 87 L |