1968 BMW 1600 vs. 2000 Opel Omega
To start off, 2000 Opel Omega is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 BMW 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 BMW 1600 would be higher. At 3,175 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Opel Omega (218 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1968 BMW 1600. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 1968 BMW 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Opel Omega weights approximately 720 kg more than 1968 BMW 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Opel Omega (290 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 BMW 1600. (160 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 BMW 1600.
Compare all specifications:
1968 BMW 1600 | 2000 Opel Omega | |
Make | BMW | Opel |
Model | 1600 | Omega |
Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 3175 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 218 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 290 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 75 L |