1968 BMW 1600 vs. 2002 Ford Tonka
To start off, 2002 Ford Tonka is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 BMW 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 BMW 1600 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Tonka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Tonka (128 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1968 BMW 1600. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Tonka should accelerate faster than 1968 BMW 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Tonka weights approximately 312 kg more than 1968 BMW 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Tonka (814 Nm) has 654 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 BMW 1600. (160 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Tonka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 BMW 1600.
Compare all specifications:
1968 BMW 1600 | 2002 Ford Tonka | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 1600 | Tonka |
Year Released | 1968 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 814 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1302 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 6150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 2370 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 4200 mm |