1968 BMW 1600 vs. 2002 Seat Inca Kombi
To start off, 2002 Seat Inca Kombi is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 BMW 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 BMW 1600 would be higher. At 1,990 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 BMW 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 BMW 1600 (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. (59 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 BMW 1600 should accelerate faster than 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Seat Inca Kombi weights approximately 45 kg more than 1968 BMW 1600.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 BMW 1600 (160 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. (107 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1968 BMW 1600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Seat Inca Kombi.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 BMW 1600 | 2002 Seat Inca Kombi | |
| Make | BMW | Seat |
| Model | 1600 | Inca Kombi |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1391 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 107 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1035 kg |
