1968 BMW 1600 vs. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 BMW 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 BMW 1600 would be higher. At 4,162 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1968 BMW 1600. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1968 BMW 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1257 kg more than 1968 BMW 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 BMW 1600. (160 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 BMW 1600.
Compare all specifications:
1968 BMW 1600 | 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 1600 | TrailBlazer |
Year Released | 1968 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 4162 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 275 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 373 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.1:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 2247 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3280 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 95 L |