1968 BMW 1600 vs. 2005 Koenigsegg CCR
To start off, 2005 Koenigsegg CCR is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 BMW 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 BMW 1600 would be higher. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Koenigsegg CCR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Koenigsegg CCR (816 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 716 more horse power than 1968 BMW 1600. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Koenigsegg CCR should accelerate faster than 1968 BMW 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Koenigsegg CCR weights approximately 190 kg more than 1968 BMW 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Koenigsegg CCR (920 Nm @ 5700 RPM) has 760 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 BMW 1600. (160 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Koenigsegg CCR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 BMW 1600.
Compare all specifications:
1968 BMW 1600 | 2005 Koenigsegg CCR | |
Make | BMW | Koenigsegg |
Model | 1600 | CCR |
Year Released | 1968 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 4719 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 816 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 920 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 8.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4191 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1989 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1069 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2659 mm |