1968 BMW 1600 vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 BMW 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 BMW 1600 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 48 more horse power than 1968 BMW 1600. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1968 BMW 1600.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 BMW 1600. (160 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 BMW 1600.
Compare all specifications:
1968 BMW 1600 | 2010 Holden Epica | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | 1600 | Epica |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 160 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2700 mm |