1968 BMW 1600 vs. 2012 Volkswagen Eos
To start off, 2012 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 BMW 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 BMW 1600 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Volkswagen Eos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volkswagen Eos (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1968 BMW 1600. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volkswagen Eos should accelerate faster than 1968 BMW 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volkswagen Eos weights approximately 629 kg more than 1968 BMW 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volkswagen Eos (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 BMW 1600. (160 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 Volkswagen Eos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 BMW 1600.
Compare all specifications:
1968 BMW 1600 | 2012 Volkswagen Eos | |
Make | BMW | Volkswagen |
Model | 1600 | Eos |
Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 280 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1619 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4423 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1791 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1444 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2578 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 55 L |