1968 BMW 2000 vs. 1952 Holden FX
To start off, 1968 BMW 2000 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 BMW 2000 (118 HP) has 67 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 BMW 2000 should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Holden FX weights approximately 10 kg more than 1968 BMW 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 BMW 2000 (167 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1968 BMW 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1968 BMW 2000 | 1952 Holden FX | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | 2000 | FX |
Year Released | 1968 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2166 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 51 HP |
Torque | 167 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2620 mm |