1968 BMW 2000 vs. 1963 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1968 BMW 2000 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 BMW 2000 (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1963 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 BMW 2000 should accelerate faster than 1963 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 72 kg more than 1968 BMW 2000.
Because 1963 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 BMW 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 BMW 2000 (167 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1968 BMW 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
1968 BMW 2000 | 1963 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 2000 | CJ5 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1963 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1032 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2060 mm |