1968 BMW 2000 vs. 1963 Triumph Herald
To start off, 1968 BMW 2000 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 BMW 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 BMW 2000 (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 BMW 2000 should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 BMW 2000 weights approximately 180 kg more than 1963 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 BMW 2000 (167 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1968 BMW 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
1968 BMW 2000 | 1963 Triumph Herald | |
Make | BMW | Triumph |
Model | 2000 | Herald |
Year Released | 1968 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1147 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 69.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 29 L |