1968 BMW 2000 vs. 1966 Seat 1500
To start off, 1968 BMW 2000 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 BMW 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 BMW 2000 (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1966 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 BMW 2000 should accelerate faster than 1966 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Seat 1500 weights approximately 200 kg more than 1968 BMW 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 BMW 2000 | 1966 Seat 1500 | |
| Make | BMW | Seat |
| Model | 2000 | 1500 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1481 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2660 mm |
