1968 BMW 2000 vs. 1977 Buick Regal
To start off, 1977 Buick Regal is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 3,214 cc (6 cylinders), 1977 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 BMW 2000 (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1977 Buick Regal. (89 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 BMW 2000 should accelerate faster than 1977 Buick Regal. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Buick Regal weights approximately 470 kg more than 1968 BMW 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Buick Regal (224 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 BMW 2000. (167 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1977 Buick Regal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 BMW 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1968 BMW 2000 | 1977 Buick Regal | |
Make | BMW | Buick |
Model | 2000 | Regal |
Year Released | 1968 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3214 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 224 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2750 mm |