1968 BMW 2000 vs. 1994 Dodge Neon
To start off, 1994 Dodge Neon is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Dodge Neon (129 HP @ 5850 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1968 BMW 2000. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1968 BMW 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Dodge Neon weights approximately 102 kg more than 1968 BMW 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 BMW 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 BMW 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Dodge Neon (174 Nm @ 4950 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 BMW 2000. (167 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1994 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 BMW 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 BMW 2000 | 1994 Dodge Neon | |
| Make | BMW | Dodge |
| Model | 2000 | Neon |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1994 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5850 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 174 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4950 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 87.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1062 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 68 L |
