1968 BMW 2000 vs. 1995 Peugeot 106
To start off, 1995 Peugeot 106 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 BMW 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 BMW 2000 (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1995 Peugeot 106. (100 HP @ 7200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 BMW 2000 should accelerate faster than 1995 Peugeot 106. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 BMW 2000 weights approximately 150 kg more than 1995 Peugeot 106. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 BMW 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 BMW 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Peugeot 106, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 BMW 2000 (167 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Peugeot 106. (109 Nm @ 5400 RPM). This means 1968 BMW 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Peugeot 106.
Compare all specifications:
1968 BMW 2000 | 1995 Peugeot 106 | |
Make | BMW | Peugeot |
Model | 2000 | 106 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1292 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 109 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 73.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 3570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 45 L |