1968 BMW 2000 vs. 1997 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1997 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Cadillac DeVille (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1968 BMW 2000. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1968 BMW 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 745 kg more than 1968 BMW 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 BMW 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 BMW 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 BMW 2000 | 1997 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 2000 | DeVille |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 271 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1705 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 5330 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1950 mm |
