1968 BMW 2000 vs. 1997 Suzuki Sidekick
To start off, 1997 Suzuki Sidekick is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 BMW 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 BMW 2000 (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1997 Suzuki Sidekick. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 BMW 2000 should accelerate faster than 1997 Suzuki Sidekick.
Because 1968 BMW 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 BMW 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Suzuki Sidekick, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 BMW 2000 (167 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Suzuki Sidekick. (133 Nm). This means 1968 BMW 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Suzuki Sidekick.
Compare all specifications:
1968 BMW 2000 | 1997 Suzuki Sidekick | |
Make | BMW | Suzuki |
Model | 2000 | Sidekick |
Year Released | 1968 | 1997 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 133 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 30 L |