1968 BMW 2000 vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (130 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1968 BMW 2000. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1968 BMW 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 426 kg more than 1968 BMW 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda Tribute (183 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 BMW 2000. (167 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 BMW 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1968 BMW 2000 | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 2000 | Tribute |
Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 183 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1386 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 62 L |