1968 BMW 2000 vs. 2011 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2011 Holden Cruze is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 BMW 2000 would be higher. Both 1968 BMW 2000 and 2011 Holden Cruze are equipped with a 1,991 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Cruze (161 HP) has 43 more horse power than 1968 BMW 2000. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1968 BMW 2000.
Because 1968 BMW 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 BMW 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Cruze (360 Nm) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 BMW 2000. (167 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 BMW 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1968 BMW 2000 | 2011 Holden Cruze | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | 2000 | Cruze |
Year Released | 1968 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 167 Nm | 360 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2685 mm |