1968 BMW 2002 vs. 1950 Bristol 450
To start off, 1968 BMW 2002 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 1,990 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 BMW 2002 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Bristol 450 (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1968 BMW 2002. (98 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Bristol 450 should accelerate faster than 1968 BMW 2002. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 BMW 2002 weights approximately 300 kg more than 1950 Bristol 450.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 BMW 2002 | 1950 Bristol 450 | |
Make | BMW | Bristol |
Model | 2002 | 450 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1971 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 66 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 96 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 54 L |