1968 BMW 2002 vs. 1959 Land Rover 109
To start off, 1968 BMW 2002 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Land Rover 109. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Land Rover 109 would be higher. At 2,286 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Land Rover 109 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 BMW 2002 (130 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1959 Land Rover 109. (67 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 BMW 2002 should accelerate faster than 1959 Land Rover 109. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Land Rover 109 weights approximately 674 kg more than 1968 BMW 2002.
Because 1959 Land Rover 109 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 BMW 2002. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Land Rover 109 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 BMW 2002 (178 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Land Rover 109. (157 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1968 BMW 2002 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Land Rover 109.
Compare all specifications:
1968 BMW 2002 | 1959 Land Rover 109 | |
Make | BMW | Land Rover |
Model | 2002 | 109 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2286 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1026 kg | 1700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 2070 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2780 mm |