1968 BMW 2002 vs. 1960 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1968 BMW 2002 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac DeVille (198 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1968 BMW 2002. (130 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1968 BMW 2002. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1079 kg more than 1968 BMW 2002. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 BMW 2002 | 1960 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 2002 | DeVille |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 198 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1026 kg | 2105 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 5730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 75 L |
