1968 BMW 2002 vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1968 BMW 2002 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 BMW 2002 (130 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 BMW 2002 should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 144 kg more than 1968 BMW 2002.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 BMW 2002 (178 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1968 BMW 2002 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1968 BMW 2002 | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | BMW | Triumph |
Model | 2002 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1026 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 64 L |