1968 BMW 2002 vs. 1965 DKW Munga
To start off, 1968 BMW 2002 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 BMW 2002 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 BMW 2002 (130 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 BMW 2002 should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 DKW Munga weights approximately 84 kg more than 1968 BMW 2002.
Because 1965 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 BMW 2002. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 BMW 2002 | 1965 DKW Munga | |
Make | BMW | DKW |
Model | 2002 | Munga |
Year Released | 1968 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1026 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 31 L |