1968 BMW 2002 vs. 1967 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1968 BMW 2002 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,958 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (290 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1968 BMW 2002. (130 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1968 BMW 2002.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (393 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 BMW 2002. (178 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 BMW 2002.
Compare all specifications:
1968 BMW 2002 | 1967 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 2002 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1968 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 4958 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 290 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 393 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 101.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 76.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2750 mm |