1968 BMW 2002 vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1968 BMW 2002 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1968 BMW 2002. (98 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1968 BMW 2002. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 260 kg more than 1968 BMW 2002. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Nissan Cedric (166 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 BMW 2002. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1967 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 BMW 2002.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 BMW 2002 | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | BMW | Nissan |
| Model | 2002 | Cedric |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 98 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 166 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2700 mm |
