1968 BMW 2002 vs. 1970 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1970 Mazda RX-2 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1970 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1968 BMW 2002. (98 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1968 BMW 2002. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 BMW 2002 weights approximately 70 kg more than 1970 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 157 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 BMW 2002 | 1970 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | BMW | Mazda |
| Model | 2002 | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1990 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 98 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2480 mm |
