1968 BMW 2002 vs. 1973 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1973 Cadillac Calais is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1968 BMW 2002. (98 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1968 BMW 2002. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 1215 kg more than 1968 BMW 2002. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1968 BMW 2002 | 1973 Cadillac Calais | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 2002 | Calais |
Year Released | 1968 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 7734 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 2245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 5880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3310 mm |