1968 BMW 2002 vs. 1973 Chrysler 160
To start off, 1973 Chrysler 160 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 1,990 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 BMW 2002 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 BMW 2002 (98 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1973 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 BMW 2002 should accelerate faster than 1973 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 35 kg more than 1968 BMW 2002.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 BMW 2002 (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1968 BMW 2002 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1968 BMW 2002 | 1973 Chrysler 160 | |
Make | BMW | Chrysler |
Model | 2002 | 160 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1638 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2680 mm |