1968 BMW 2002 vs. 1979 Chrysler 160
To start off, 1979 Chrysler 160 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 BMW 2002 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 BMW 2002 (130 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1979 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 BMW 2002 should accelerate faster than 1979 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 59 kg more than 1968 BMW 2002.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 BMW 2002 (178 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Chrysler 160. (132 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1968 BMW 2002 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 BMW 2002 | 1979 Chrysler 160 | |
| Make | BMW | Chrysler |
| Model | 2002 | 160 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1639 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 178 Nm | 132 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1026 kg | 1085 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2680 mm |
