1968 BMW 2002 vs. 1989 Fiat Vivace
To start off, 1989 Fiat Vivace is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 BMW 2002 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 BMW 2002 (130 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1989 Fiat Vivace. (64 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 BMW 2002 should accelerate faster than 1989 Fiat Vivace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 BMW 2002 weights approximately 216 kg more than 1989 Fiat Vivace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 BMW 2002 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 BMW 2002. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Fiat Vivace, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 BMW 2002 (178 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Fiat Vivace. (102 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1968 BMW 2002 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Fiat Vivace.
Compare all specifications:
1968 BMW 2002 | 1989 Fiat Vivace | |
Make | BMW | Fiat |
Model | 2002 | Vivace |
Year Released | 1968 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1370 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 86.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 55.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.1:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1026 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2230 mm |