1968 BMW 2002 vs. 1995 Ford Probe
To start off, 1995 Ford Probe is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 2,507 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Probe is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Probe weights approximately 319 kg more than 1968 BMW 2002.
Because 1968 BMW 2002 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 BMW 2002. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Ford Probe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Probe (218 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 BMW 2002. (178 Nm). This means 1995 Ford Probe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 BMW 2002.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 BMW 2002 | 1995 Ford Probe | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | 2002 | Probe |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2507 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 178 Nm | 218 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 84.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 74.2 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1026 kg | 1345 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 55 L |
