1968 BMW 2002 vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 BMW 2002 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 BMW 2002 weights approximately 95 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio.
Because 1968 BMW 2002 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 BMW 2002. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 BMW 2002 | 1998 Renault Clio | |
| Make | BMW | Renault |
| Model | 2002 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1998 |
| Horse Power | 98 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 170 km/hour | 181 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 50 L |
