1968 BMW 2002 vs. 2000 Kia Avella
To start off, 2000 Kia Avella is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 1,990 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 BMW 2002 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 BMW 2002 (98 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2000 Kia Avella. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 BMW 2002 should accelerate faster than 2000 Kia Avella. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 BMW 2002 weights approximately 115 kg more than 2000 Kia Avella. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 BMW 2002 (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Kia Avella. (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1968 BMW 2002 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Kia Avella.
Compare all specifications:
1968 BMW 2002 | 2000 Kia Avella | |
Make | BMW | Kia |
Model | 2002 | Avella |
Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1322 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2400 mm |