1968 BMW 2002 vs. 2003 Caterham 7

To start off, 2003 Caterham 7 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 1,990 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 BMW 2002 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Caterham 7 (200 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1968 BMW 2002. (98 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1968 BMW 2002. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 BMW 2002 weights approximately 540 kg more than 2003 Caterham 7.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Caterham 7 (210 Nm @ 5750 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 BMW 2002. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 BMW 2002.

Compare all specifications:

1968 BMW 2002 2003 Caterham 7
Make BMW Caterham
Model 2002 7
Year Released 1968 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1990 cc 1796 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 98 HP 200 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 7500 RPM
Torque 157 Nm 210 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 5750 RPM
Engine Bore Size 89 mm 80.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 80 mm 89.3 mm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1030 kg 490 kg
Vehicle Length 4100 mm 3110 mm
Vehicle Width 1590 mm 1580 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 810 mm
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2230 mm