1968 BMW 2002 vs. 2003 Tata E
To start off, 2003 Tata E is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Tata E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Tata E (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1968 BMW 2002. (98 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Tata E should accelerate faster than 1968 BMW 2002. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Tata E weights approximately 344 kg more than 1968 BMW 2002. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Tata E (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 BMW 2002. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Tata E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 BMW 2002.
Compare all specifications:
1968 BMW 2002 | 2003 Tata E | |
Make | BMW | Tata |
Model | 2002 | E |
Year Released | 1968 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1374 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2810 mm |