1968 BMW 2002 vs. 2006 Buick Lucerne
To start off, 2006 Buick Lucerne is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Buick Lucerne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Buick Lucerne (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1968 BMW 2002. (130 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Buick Lucerne should accelerate faster than 1968 BMW 2002. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Buick Lucerne weights approximately 591 kg more than 1968 BMW 2002. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 BMW 2002 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 BMW 2002. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Buick Lucerne, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Buick Lucerne (308 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 BMW 2002. (178 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Buick Lucerne will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 BMW 2002.
Compare all specifications:
1968 BMW 2002 | 2006 Buick Lucerne | |
Make | BMW | Buick |
Model | 2002 | Lucerne |
Year Released | 1968 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 308 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 97 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1026 kg | 1617 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 5170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2940 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 68 L |