1968 BMW 2002 vs. 2008 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 540 kg more than 1968 BMW 2002.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 BMW 2002. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (297 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 BMW 2002. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 BMW 2002.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 BMW 2002 | 2008 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | BMW | Jeep |
| Model | 2002 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1990 cc | 3960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 98 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 297 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 98.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 86.7 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 170 km/hour | 174 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1570 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 72 L |
