1968 BMW 2002 vs. 2009 Chevrolet Epica
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 BMW 2002 would be higher. Both 1968 BMW 2002 and 2009 Chevrolet Epica are equipped with a 1,991 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Epica (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1968 BMW 2002. (130 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Epica should accelerate faster than 1968 BMW 2002. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 609 kg more than 1968 BMW 2002. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 BMW 2002 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 BMW 2002. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Epica (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 BMW 2002. (178 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 BMW 2002.
Compare all specifications:
1968 BMW 2002 | 2009 Chevrolet Epica | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 2002 | Epica |
Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 17.5:1 |
Top Speed | 193 km/hour | 200 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1026 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 65 L |