1968 BMW 2002 vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1968 BMW 2002. (98 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1968 BMW 2002.
Because 1968 BMW 2002 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 BMW 2002. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-350 (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 BMW 2002. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 BMW 2002.
Compare all specifications:
1968 BMW 2002 | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 2002 | E-350 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 57 L |